Let Our People Go!

by Jay Therrell
August 12.2022

After decades of conflict on a variety of theological issues within The United Methodist Church, hope appeared for an amicable separation in January 2020 with the announcement of the Protocol of Reconciliation and Grace Through Separation. The Protocol represented a mediated settlement between theological conservatives, centrists, and progressives to end denominational fighting and part ways. It was a compromise. Every side gave-in on key issues so that they could also achieve certain non-negotiables. It represented a beautiful witness to the world that Christians who disagree could do so without being disagreeable. The Wesleyan Covenant Association was humbly proud to be a part of the creation of the Protocol and enthusiastically supported it.

Sadly, the COVID-19 pandemic led to General Conference 2020 being postponed numerous times. In March of this year, the Commission on the General Conference chose to once again delay the General Conference to meet, at the earliest, in 2024.  Shortly after announcing that decision the Rev. Joe DiPaolo, member of the Commission and the WCA’s Global Council, shared the real story of how that decision was made casting extreme doubt around the process for making it.

In June of 2022, progressive signatories to the Protocol and progressive and centrist endorsing organizations announced they were no longer supporting its adoption. In their announcement, they stated, “… we can no longer in good faith support the Protocol of Reconciliation & Grace through Separation or work towards its adoption at the next General Conference.” For many reasons, several inaccurate, they ended the hard work and hope of so many.

Immediately following the announcement by progressive and centrist leaders, I shared an initial reaction from the WCA. I noted that this was the final straw for us. For the past two years, progressives have waged a campaign of cherry picking the provisions of The Book of Discipline they will follow while insisting that departing theological conservatives meet the extreme letter of the law. The adage of, “Rules for thee, but not for me,” comes to mind.

Through all of that, the WCA has done its best to lead traditionalists to wait for the Protocol to pass. It was hard, but theologically conservative leaders believed it was the right thing to do. I finished the piece by saying, “I hope progressives and centrists realize what they’re doing by publicly removing their support for the Protocol.  In doing so, they have made clear that they have no intention of treating theological conservatives fairly and with grace. We will contend.”

Today, I announce the WCA is calling on theologically conservative laity in local churches to lead their church councils to immediately begin withholding all apportionments and escrow them. We are making this call to laity in 19 annual conferences that are adding onerous and punitive requirements to disaffiliation provisions under paragraph 2553 of The Book of Discipline. This includes general, jurisdictional, annual conference, and district apportionments. (It DOES NOT include direct-billed items such as property and casualty and health insurance premiums or pension payments.) Escrowed funds would be held by the local church until their bishop and annual conference open a reasonable route to disaffiliation. Those funds could then be used to support the cost of disaffiliation.

To be clear, of the 53 American annual conferences, these 19 are making disaffiliation processes extremely difficult, and in some cases impossible. The other 34 annual conferences do not all have “clean” paragraph 2553 processes. Some add requirements that are beyond what paragraph 2553 requires, but in our judgement these additions do not prevent most churches from disaffiliating.

For laity and local churches in the remaining 34 annual conferences, we realize that some of you will want to stand in solidarity with your sisters and brothers being mistreated. For you, we call on you to consider withholding and escrowing your episcopal fund apportionment which goes directly to paying bishops’ salaries and expenses.

To eliminate any confusion, at the end of this article, we are publishing a list of the 17 annual conferences that are adding punitive requirements to their 2553 process so that laity will know if their annual conference is doing so. We have also prepared a step-by-step guide to assist laity in making these motions in their local church councils. Clergy should not and cannot have anything to do with these motions. This must be a completely lay-led movement.

To receive our step-by-step guide, we encourage you to confidentially email us at apportionments@wesleyancovenant.org. Additionally, we hope to confidentially track which churches are choosing to withhold and escrow apportionments and ask that once your church council has decided to do so (or if you are already doing so) to please email us to let us know at apportionments@wesleyancovenant.org.

Nowhere in Scripture are followers of Jesus called to support efforts of the church that are antithetical to the Gospel. To the contrary, Jude, the half-brother of Jesus, calls the church in his letter to “…contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to God’s holy people.” (Jude 3) In fact, 2 John 9-11 reminds us that those who support persons spreading unbiblical teaching share responsibility for doing so (see also Ephesians 5:3-7). It is time for us no longer to stand idly by while progressive leaders take our money, use it to support their liberal causes, and then seek to punish us further. It is wrong, and we will not feed that abuse any longer.

This step is lamentable. Progressives should not have placed us in this situation. A General Conference could have taken place this year. We could have had one already if the Commission on General Conference was willing to hold a hybrid, virtual, or distributed meeting, and an in-person conference would have been possible. Other denominations have done so including the African Methodist Episcopal Church and The Episcopal Church. Numerous large gatherings are taking place around the U.S., including sporting events and conventions with tens of thousands of participants. Where there is a will, there is a way.

Progressives, instead, have chosen to strategically delay General Conference and adopting the Protocol. One wonders if this decision is a tactic of trapping churches to keep their apportionment base from shrinking. Moreover, one wonders if it’s also an intentional choice of hoping that people will vote with their proverbial feet which, in turn, weakens the local church to the point of it closing and thereby enabling an annual conference to sell the property for the benefit of sustaining the annual conference. Progressives and centrists have chosen to destroy the Protocol. They have forced us to this place.

The time has come to stop supporting agendas that seek to hurt the orthodox, theologically conservative movement. It is time for us to send a collective message that we will not stand for this anymore. Bishops and other progressive leaders, when you choose to treat theologically conservative churches fairly and let us go, this can end. The choice is yours.

Annual Conferences Adding Punitive Requirements to Paragraph 2553

(We call on laity in these conferences to confidentially email apportionments@wesleyancovenant.org to receive an instruction guide on how to ask your church council to withhold and escrow ALL apportionments.)

  1. Baltimore-Washington Annual Conference (50% of fair market value of real estate and return of all restricted funds)
  2. California-Nevada Annual Conference (20% of fair market value of real estate, first right of refusal of Conference to purchase property back if goes up for sale in first seven years at 20% of fair market value, pro-rata share of Boy Scout settlement costs)
  3. California-Pacific Annual Conference (50% of fair market value of real estate, repayment of conference and district grants for previous three years)
  4. Eastern Pennsylvania Annual Conference (giving up all insurance local churches have paid premiums for through annual conference leaving churches widely exposed with little to no options for coverage. $6,500 administrative fee, $5,000 to support historic St. George’s, pro-rata share of Boy Scout settlement costs, an additional year of pay for pastor that doesn’t disaffiliate with church plus paying for two additional moves, Missional Transition Support Payment that includes up to 33% of value of church’s non real estate assets)
  5. Florida Annual Conference (giving up 26 years of insurance local churches have paid for through annual conference leaving churches widely exposed with little to no options for coverage, must buy insurance coverage for Florida Conference to cover all of their liability for previous three years)
  6. Greater New Jersey Annual Conference (repay conference grants for the last three years, pay unfunded retiree health care liabilities, pro-rata share of Boy Scout settlement cost, 18 months’ clergy compensation for pastors who do not disaffiliate, moving costs for two moves of such pastors, conference legal and court costs, percentage of all cash and investments equal to the percentage voting against disaffiliation, $3,500 administrative fee, possible payment for church property determined by conference trustees)
  7. Illinois Great Rivers Annual Conference (50% of assets as a starting point for negotiation)
  1. Louisiana Annual Conference (payment of an extra year of apportionments totaling three years, pension liability calculated on the least favorable of 4 factors (not consistent church to church), repossessing of hymnals)
  2. Missouri Annual Conference (payment of an extra year of apportionments totaling three years, repayment of conference grants from previous five years)
  3. Mountain Sky Annual Conference (repayment of conference grants from previous ten years, pay percentage of fair market value of real estate determined by conference after local church votes to disaffiliate/church can’t take vote knowing how much it would have to pay)
  4. New England Annual Conference (onerous discernment period that includes, among other things, public comment meetings for people who don’t attend church to give their opinion)
  5. Northern Illinois Annual Conference (no official process made public at this time)
  6. Oregon-Idaho Annual Conference (insuring the annual conference against any past or future claim connected to the local church or its property – insurance that is essentially impossible to obtain)
  7. Peninsula-Delaware Annual Conference (50% of appraised market value of real estate)
  8. South Carolina Annual Conference (no official process made public; bishop will not allow churches to disaffiliate under paragraph 2553)
  9. Susquehanna Annual Conference (65% of fair market value of real estate)
  10. West Virginia Annual Conference (no official process, requiring churches to close under paragraph 2549 instead of disaffiliating under paragraph 2553)

The Rev. Jay Therrell is president of the Wesleyan Covenant Association.

Scroll to Top